No....its just that as a woman and a lefty it was a safebet you would wash up here...;-)
Pam and Sophia are good sorts and are pretty tolerant of we evil right wingers popping in with cutting critisism when we aren't out evicting poor people from their cardboard boxes on Christmas eve so in the spirit of honestly held disagreement...welcome!
Sorry to pop your bubble Sophia, especially as the world has only gained 0.9 degrees in heat in the last 1000 years. But until you can prove otherwise, I would refrain from believing everything Bomber says.
James, to claim we know so little about the the cause and effect of climate factors is also, in your own words, 'arrogant and fucking retarded'
Ok Sophia...put up or shut up.Show us the full,complete and total body of Climate change knowledge that is availible.No can do...? Thats because it doesn't exist.Science itself admits that it is ignorant of much of what happens in causing weather and the factors involved.The role of clouds in climate science is one example of a yawning gap in the picture.
The point remains that screaming for big government action to remedy a problem you can't even be certain that you have or that it will make any positive difference if you do is fucken retarded.
Global warming hysteria is just an attempt to impose socialism by stealth.....
I thought it was only 0.6 Heine...? Its still bugger all though either way...
Sophia...considering that we are still unable to get 100% accurate forecasts for 24, or even 12 hours in the future from our weather people with all the computers and satellites and aquired knowledge they have at their disposal, what is it that justifys your belife that these people can accuratly predict the climate condictions 10 20 or 50 years from now?
Not to mention even this week Danish climate change scientists and researchers found that it is more likely the magnetic field of the Sun does more for climate change than what Sophia is proclaiming.
James, if Dear Leader says the world will end and we need to pay more taxes, you'd better believe her! :)
Guys, I haven't 'proclaimed' anything. I never said I did/din't agree with climate change. However last time I checked neither me or James is a scientist, and so we can only go off what we have read. I read things that would suggest that climate change is happening, while James may have read otherwise. Either way, neither of us are in a position to make such claims about it seeing as we are not scientists.
haha im convinced, James et al have no fucking clue what they are talking about. What is the point of discussing climate change with someone with no scientific background, who gets his hairbrained ideas from websites, and who is arguing with the vast majority of science experts.
theres a list, james, you fucktard, of organisations with two braincells to rub together, who actually have a slogan something along the lines of 'james doesnt know shit and he needs to go home and cry.'
must be pretty sweet for james to just 'know' more than the United States National Academy of Sciences and the American Institute of Physics. That would be pretty sweet, if you just knew more than everyone else.
I think, no, I KNOW the problem with jamesee. He begins his 'reasoning' (and I use the term loosely) from the point of 'nothing shall iminge on my sacred rights, including the right to accumulate wealth.' Therefore, when someone says 'we should use public transport because private transport is inefficient, and it's causing the emission of too large a volume of greenhouse gases' he thinks 'no fucking way am I giving up my right to drive a car (or whatever)' and goes from there, attempting to discredit a fact, because it doesnt suit his little world.
"haha im convinced, James et al have no fucking clue what they are talking about. What is the point of discussing climate change with someone with no scientific background, who gets his hairbrained ideas from websites, and who is arguing with the vast majority of science experts."
Did you happen to check out Mr Coby Becks profile Tom....? You may have seen this listed as his occupation..."Artificial Intelligence Engineer" NOT Climatologist or related field. Granted being an artificial intelligence engineer suggests hes no dummy but as he doesn't work in the relavant field then your critisism of me lacking knowledge applys to him also by your own definiition.
Pathetic anon and Tom, calling people names just makes you sound like you cannot offer anything constructive to the discussion. Perhaps you are new to blogging or just are too young to be able to join in on debate. Whatever, if you feel that insulting James is the best way to get your opinions (or lack of as I have no idea where you stand on this) then you are on a losing team mate.
I feel that hiding that is best for my own protection lol, or maybe its just I have a remarkably boring name so welly_girl at least tells you where I live.
Agreed Pamzie. I am sure even the most public of bloggers still are much different in real life. Welly girl included should be allowed to maintain her anonimity.
Welly Girl, if you want to keep your real life under wraps, best not put it on Kiwiblog :)
33 comments:
I saw this coming probably longer than you did Wellington Girl. But nonetheless welcome aboard.
Thanks... I am intrigued as to how you saw this coming???
Maybe the right have secret psychic powers :-P
No....its just that as a woman and a lefty it was a safebet you would wash up here...;-)
Pam and Sophia are good sorts and are pretty tolerant of we evil right wingers popping in with cutting critisism when we aren't out evicting poor people from their cardboard boxes on Christmas eve so in the spirit of honestly held disagreement...welcome!
I just saw your blog and it reminded me of something I have read here and elsewhere :)
James, I would of thought my policy of feeding the homeless to the hungry was sufficient to ending the crisis in NZ?
Maybe the fact i am a little young labour bunny would explain why I am in line with the ideals of this blog, and its wonderful other contributors
"James, I would of thought my policy of feeding the homeless to the hungry was sufficient to ending the crisis in NZ?"
I agree it was but then Labour twigged that this would cut into their voter base and raised some "human rights" objection...sigh!
oh and the drycleaners called....your swastika armband is ready for pick up.Thet were able to get the Zyklon-B stains out after all...sweet! ;-)
Great. Look forward to it, get generating! And give L a prod
Sorry to jump in, but - A Global Day of Action
There has to be a stand against Global Warming, and someone has to start making it:
For three days only
www.heatwavefm.net
Stay tuned, things are about to heat up this weekend
Too bad you don't got no soapbox anymore, S, you could have told the world. Oh well.
Sorry to pop your bubble Sophia, especially as the world has only gained 0.9 degrees in heat in the last 1000 years. But until you can prove otherwise, I would refrain from believing everything Bomber says.
James, to claim we know so little about the the cause and effect of climate factors is also, in your own words, 'arrogant and fucking retarded'
Ok Sophia...put up or shut up.Show us the full,complete and total body of Climate change knowledge that is availible.No can do...? Thats because it doesn't exist.Science itself admits that it is ignorant of much of what happens in causing weather and the factors involved.The role of clouds in climate science is one example of a yawning gap in the picture.
The point remains that screaming for big government action to remedy a problem you can't even be certain that you have or that it will make any positive difference if you do is fucken retarded.
Global warming hysteria is just an attempt to impose socialism by stealth.....
I thought it was only 0.6 Heine...? Its still bugger all though either way...
Sophia...considering that we are still unable to get 100% accurate forecasts for 24, or even 12 hours in the future from our weather people with all the computers and satellites and aquired knowledge they have at their disposal, what is it that justifys your belife that these people can accuratly predict the climate condictions 10 20 or 50 years from now?
Not to mention even this week Danish climate change scientists and researchers found that it is more likely the magnetic field of the Sun does more for climate change than what Sophia is proclaiming.
James, if Dear Leader says the world will end and we need to pay more taxes, you'd better believe her! :)
Guys, I haven't 'proclaimed' anything. I never said I did/din't agree with climate change. However last time I checked neither me or James is a scientist, and so we can only go off what we have read. I read things that would suggest that climate change is happening, while James may have read otherwise. Either way, neither of us are in a position to make such claims about it seeing as we are not scientists.
Brilliant, so in that case an open mind on this is a far more sensible option rather than running about panicking that the sky will fall isn't it?
Woo hoo welcome aboard welly girl :D
DON'T get me started on global warming...
...." Either way, neither of us are in a position to make such claims about it seeing as we are not scientists."
True.And considering all the scientists don't agree either then all we should do is wait and see..;-)
haha im convinced, James et al have no fucking clue what they are talking about. What is the point of discussing climate change with someone with no scientific background, who gets his hairbrained ideas from websites, and who is arguing with the vast majority of science experts.
you want proof?
http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/global-warming-is-just-hoax.html
theres a list, james, you fucktard, of organisations with two braincells to rub together, who actually have a slogan something along the lines of 'james doesnt know shit and he needs to go home and cry.'
must be pretty sweet for james to just 'know' more than the United States National Academy of Sciences and the American Institute of Physics. That would be pretty sweet, if you just knew more than everyone else.
I think, no, I KNOW the problem with jamesee. He begins his 'reasoning' (and I use the term loosely) from the point of 'nothing shall iminge on my sacred rights, including the right to accumulate wealth.' Therefore, when someone says 'we should use public transport because private transport is inefficient, and it's causing the emission of too large a volume of greenhouse gases' he thinks 'no fucking way am I giving up my right to drive a car (or whatever)' and goes from there, attempting to discredit a fact, because it doesnt suit his little world.
Sigh...if thats the level of argument you two can muster then I claim the game. ;-)
Reduced to insults they conceded defeat...
"haha im convinced, James et al have no fucking clue what they are talking about. What is the point of discussing climate change with someone with no scientific background, who gets his hairbrained ideas from websites, and who is arguing with the vast majority of science experts."
Did you happen to check out Mr Coby Becks profile Tom....? You may have seen this listed as his occupation..."Artificial Intelligence Engineer" NOT Climatologist or related field. Granted being an artificial intelligence engineer suggests hes no dummy but as he doesn't work in the relavant field then your critisism of me lacking knowledge applys to him also by your own definiition.
You got served boyeeeeee!
Whatever Tom....you go with the AI guy ande his take on Global warming and I'll go with the evidence as it comes to light...;-)
You are still a loser with the insults...
Why do these threads always get diverted to Climate Change?
So who are you Welly_Girl? and why must you hide?
I think Tommy wasn't breast fed as a baby...which he remains....;-)
Pathetic anon and Tom, calling people names just makes you sound like you cannot offer anything constructive to the discussion. Perhaps you are new to blogging or just are too young to be able to join in on debate. Whatever, if you feel that insulting James is the best way to get your opinions (or lack of as I have no idea where you stand on this) then you are on a losing team mate.
Try again, I am sure you can contribute sensibly.
well anonymous.. you too are hidden.
I feel that hiding that is best for my own protection lol, or maybe its just I have a remarkably boring name so welly_girl at least tells you where I live.
;-P
David Farrar will be placing a dating ad on his blog for myself... lol
Maybe I should not blog about my desperatedesire for a boy friend..*sigh*
Agreed Pamzie. I am sure even the most public of bloggers still are much different in real life. Welly girl included should be allowed to maintain her anonimity.
Welly Girl, if you want to keep your real life under wraps, best not put it on Kiwiblog :)
Maybe I should not blog about my desperatedesire for a boy friend..*sigh*"
Why not....are ya hot? ;-)
It pays to advertise...
Best not to ask the person themselves if they are hot...
I am sure many ppl already know who I am anyways... by reading some other blog you can work it out quite easily (if one can be bothered)
Thanks Clint :)
twas easy to figure out ;-)
Post a Comment